No, the 'math' doesn't really hold up because they entire premise is faulty. There is no such thing as a '25x rule' in the first place, of course you should account for any income you will have in retirement but that includes accounting for the nature, source and risk of said income. Nothing novel or original in that. It all ends up very dependent on your assumptions and you need to stress-test your sensitivity to those more than rely on any particular number. Really, this just sounds like rather trite content generation.
Statistics: Posted by avalpert1 — Sat Jun 08, 2024 9:45 pm — Replies 4 — Views 331
