Sorry--you said,"Maybe there are none and Claudia's right in that the tool is impressive and efficient." It sounded like you were stating the second ("tool is...") as a conclusion to the first ("...are none...")right which is why the reminder that one data point does not an argument make, not sure why you excluded that part of my post.I wouldn't call the tool impressive and efficient based on the evidence of one correct answer.I'm surprised no one asked Claudia to simply copy/paste her question (about whether she should delay SS to 70 or not) and the answer she received from chatgpt for us to read and potentially find any flaws/factual errors, etc. Maybe there are none and Claudia's right in that the tool is impressive and efficient.
I'll go edit in the missing line.
Statistics: Posted by BirdFood — Sun Jun 02, 2024 8:06 pm — Replies 54 — Views 1035