Quantcast
Channel: Bogleheads.org
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5243

Investing - Theory, News & General • Anyone notice the use of short term TIPS fund in Target Funds?

$
0
0
thanks for mentioning the white paper. i think this is it?
https://institutional.vanguard.com/cont ... Online.pdf

cheers,
grok
Sure, but that's sort of like saying "Our kids need vitamin C so we put always put a snack bag of potato chips in their lunchbox." Potato chips do contain vitamin C, but it's about 10% of the amount they need. Vanguard presents an argument for including short-term TIPS, but, as my chart above shows,

Image
Blue = approximately equivalent to VTINX
Red = Without using any short-term TIPS, all Total Bond

the amount they use is so small it barely moves the needle. It's certainly not enough to do the job they've assigned for it.
thanks for the charts. but i agree with Northern Flicker. Really what we want to do here is look at VTINX with its short-term TIPS allocation vs other funds from a DRAWDOWN perspective- i.e. the usual growth charts are not really what we are after here.

I've taken a stab at this for a $10k starting value, comparing VTINX (30% stocks) to a 50/50 blend of two of the vanguard life strategy funds: VASIX (20% stocks) and VSCGX (40% stocks) over the past 5 years, using a 3.44% annual withdrawal rate (see my post above):
viewtopic.php?p=8137665#p8137665

First the table for VASIX/VSCGX

Code:

qtrretincomeport value2019.752.39%na10,0002020.00-5.51%88.0610,1512020.257.92%82.499,5102020.502.98%88.2610,1742020.755.11%90.1010,3872021.00-0.67%93.8910,8242021.253.17%92.4710,6602021.50-0.32%94.5810,9032021.751.78%93.4710,7752022.00-5.64%94.3210,8732022.25-7.99%88.2310,1712022.50-5.01%80.489,2782022.753.73%75.798,7372023.004.44%77.948,9852023.251.35%80.709,3032023.50-2.90%81.089,3472023.757.97%78.068,9992024.001.89%83.569,6322024.250.65%84.409,7302024.505.52%84.229,7082024.750.00%88.1010,156
and here is the table for VTINX

Code:

Qtr beginnreturnincomevalue2,019.752.60%na10,0002,020.00-5.91%88.2410,1722,020.257.84%82.319,4882,020.503.12%88.0010,1442,020.755.15%89.9610,3712,021.000.08%93.7810,8112,021.253.23%93.0510,7272,021.50-0.13%95.2310,9782,021.752.01%94.2910,8692,022.00-4.77%95.3610,9922,022.25-7.37%90.0310,3782,022.50-4.64%82.679,5312,022.753.74%78.169,0102,023.004.23%80.399,2672,023.251.36%83.079,5762,023.50-2.35%83.479,6222,023.757.34%80.819,3152,024.002.09%85.999,9132,024.250.89%87.0410,0332,024.505.12%87.0610,0362,024.75na90.7310,459
some observations:
1) Average Quarterly income: VTINX = $87.48 vs. VASIX/VSCGX = $86.01 so VTINX is 1.7% higher
2) Std. Dev. of Quarterly income: VTINX = 5.30 vs VASIX/VSCGX = 5.97 so VTINX is 12% lower
3) Terminal value: VTINX = 10,459 vs VASIX/VSCGX = 10,156 so VTINX is 3.0% higher

now granted these differences are small. but i would argue they are all material and beneficial. Vanguard set out to build a fund that was a bit better for retirees in their drawdown phase. the last 5 years provide one stress test for their approach with the pandemic and the "great inflation"
So far so good.
cheers,
grok

Statistics: Posted by grok87 — Thu Dec 05, 2024 6:26 am — Replies 67 — Views 4391



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5243

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>